Youngkin, Rittenhouse, and the Death of America

A lot has happened since my last article, the stories that have stood out most to myself are the (s)election of Glenn Youngkin as Governor of Virginia and the trial/acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, and more importantly his subsequent interview with kabbalah bracelet enthusiast Tucker Carlson. Is it good that a supposedly anti-crt politician was (s)elected, I suppose; is it good that self defense is still allowed in this country, of course. I, however, am not as hopeful going forward as many red republicans are, and yes I went full Dixiecrat in referring to republicans as radical progressives, which they always have been.

First we have Glenn Youngkin, a typical neo-conservative who, while appearing to be more liberty minded than his opponent, is actually far more dangerous. A major component of his platform was combatting alleged anti-semitism. He was quick to meet with jewish groups upon his victory to assure them of his bootlicking, sorry I meant support. His plan is to criminalize anti-semitism in Virginia using the International holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition of anti-semitism. This is the same definition used by former President Trump to ban anti-semitism on college campuses, all while protecting free speech of course, and is used in many countries from Canada to Australia to much of Europe to fine and imprison people for 'horrific' crimes such as inciting racial hatred (not violence just hatred) or inciting holocaust denial. He also intends to form a holocaust, genocide, and anti-semitsm advisory commission at taxpayer expense. See his plan for yourself in the following link:

https://www.youngkinforgovernor.com/post/youngkin-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-semitism-in-virginia

So what is the IhRA definition of anti-semitism? Well this is it:

To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations: Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits. Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

• Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

• Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

• Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

• Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

• Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

• Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

• Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

• Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

• Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

• Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries). Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews. Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.

https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definitions-charters/working-definition-antisemitism

In other words the truth is anti-semitic, asking legitimate questions is anti-semitic, and eventually your own thoughts will be criminalized as anti-semitic. In the future I will go further into this, focusing on each bullet point.

Now on to Kyle Rittenhouse, the Kenosha Kid, a true American hero. Or is he? While I whole heartedly am glad he was rightfully found not guilty in the self-defense killings of rioters; jewish serial child rapist joseph rosenbaum, scumbag/career criminal Anthony Huber, and blowing the bicep off of Gaige Grosskreutz, another scumbag/career criminal, I have to say I am quite annoyed (though not surprised) he came out in support of the marxist/terrorist organization black lives matter in his interview with kabbalah Carlson. How, after all he's been through (assuming it's not a psyop), could he support the very group whose actions put him in the position he's been in since that night? Is he stupid or scared? I don't know and at this point it doesn't really matter. The best thing we can hope for is that the rotting corpse of the former U.S.A. decomposes quickly and we can bring new life back to take its place in accordance with Natural Law.